![]() Otherwise I quite like keeping some character of the lens in the final image. If it's going to be printed for a gallery or for commercial, then it might be worth making sure the image is technically as flawless as possible. It also depends on how the photo is going to be used. You might want to correct distortion and leave some vignetting, or viceversa. You can actually choose the amount of correction, so it might be worth playing around with that. You might need to zoom in 4:1 to see CA sometimes. Remove chromatic aberrations is useful and I'd rather have it on, but again, it's not something I'll systematically do unless the CA is apparent. ON1 PHOTO RAW DEFRINGE ISOOf the pure RAW conversions Irident Developer’s specialist sharpening and noise reduction tools deliver the goods here with an incredible amount of detail resolved in such a high ISO file. Vignetting I'll often keep, unless it looks ugly, for example if you have a very blue sky I find vignetting in the upper left and right corners to look quite bad. The image as processed with Topaz Denoise and Focus Magic on top of the RAW Photo Processor rendition has probably the sharpest detail of all. color space Advanced lens corrections including chromatic aberration, defringe. ON1 PHOTO RAW DEFRINGE PROFESSIONALI rarely correct distortion, maybe on landscapes shot at a very wide angle where there is obvious barrel distortion on the horizon line, but never on portraits. Professional Image Processing Open RAW and other images in a dedicated. Personally, I only use lens correction it if I think I need it by looking at the final image. So, what is the experience here among mainly Canon shooters? Is the LR Lens Correction panel a go-to for you? Or is it really more for problem lenses? ![]() Occasionally I bring a distortion problem into PS CS6, finding Adaptive Wide Angle better, and then some Transform stuff. ![]() I'd rather take care of the vignetting without letting LR fix distortion. The "Defringe" option is great and seems better than the one in PS CS6-but it doesn't work automatically, right? We must move the sliders?Īs for correcting distortion, for me, the auto result is only an improvement to my taste about 25% of the time, and that is mostly in portrait orientation. This is a perfect tool to get rid of wide angle distortion and get truer perspective lines and more attractive portraits. I've tried very hard clicking the option on and off to see any change anywhere in my images and really never do. The RAW Develop filter analyzes an image and its metadata to calculate an Automatic Lens Distortion fix that can be applied in one-click. ![]() I have a handful of Canon L lenses, and only a couple of Canon standard lenses-the 100mm macro and the 50mm 1.4. The one that seems the least useful for me is the "Remove Chromatic Aberration" option. Even after years of using LR (5.7 now) almost daily, the Lens Correction panel still has a few puzzles for me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |